If I were President Barack Obama I would also be out on the political rally circuit strongly encouraging my fellow Democrats to be strong and courageous. After all, “we” still hold a 59 to 41 majority in the U.S. Senate and a very large majority in the House of Representatives, which therefore means we control every branch of government except the Supreme Court.

     Yet we see Democrats fretting and running for political cover simply because Scott Brown won the U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts, which took away the Dems supermajority in the Senate. Senators such as Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas are capitulating to resurgent Republicans. Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota have decided not to run for reelection, thus opening the door for more Republican gains. When we couple this with other vulnerable Senate seats as those of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, Roland Burris of Illinois (appointed to fill President Barack Obama’s Senate seat by disgraced Governor Rod Blagoevich), and retiring Senator Mel Martinez of Florida, the Republicans smell political blood in the water, and it seems like Democrats are seeing themselves as the prey instead of the ruling majority.

     It seems funny that just a few months ago the GOP was in total disarray as they watched John McCain, their standard-bearer, and his VP running mate former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin  get hammered by the internet-savvy, intellectually and strategically superior change agent, Barack Hussein Obama.

     Now it seems as though the Republicans are the Buffalo Bills, who, having found themselves down by over 30 points to the Houston Oilers in the 1992 AFC Divisional Playoffs, won the game in overtime by a score of 41-38, which still stands as the greatest comeback in NFL history. I don’t know which Republican leader is the metaphorical Franck Reich, but this I do know: Democrats in both houses of Congress need to Oiler Up, Man Up, Woman Up, or whatever cliche you want to give it and provide the decisive leadership that the people who elected them are clamoring for, because if I know the Republicans as well as I think I do, once they regain the majorities in Congress, and especially if and when they regain the White House, they will be more politically decisive and fiscally incisive than what we are presently seeing from the Democrats.

     Does President Obama bear some of the responsibility for this? Of course he does, especially when you consider that he may have, out of deference or a sense of feeling a sincere or politically expedient need for shared governance, delegated too much control of the health care debate to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus. But if you will allow me to use another sports analogy I will assert that the coach’s motivation is only supposed to count for so much; it is the players’ responsibility to go out on the field and execute the game plan.  As the well-worn cliche goes, “There is no I in Team,” which politically translated means, “Stop trying to cover your own political anatomy and get behind the President if you truly believe that your policies will benefit this great nation.” And President Obama , please stay on the political offensive because, to use another cliche, “Sometimes the best defense is a good offense.”

That’s my opinion; what’s yours? (c) 2010, Sherman Crockett

      When addressing the first Tea Party Convention today, the first order of business for former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, after she thanks those present with her on the dais, should be to firmly and unequivocally denounce yesterday’s racist, insensitive, and ignorant remarks made by former Colorado congressman Tom Tancredo (see posted YouTube video). He all but called for a reinstatement of literacy tests as a voting requirement in this country. He might as well have also called for a repeal of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the repeal of the major civil rights legislation of the 1950’s and 60’s. 

     It was more than obvious that he was referring to Latinos and African Americans as the people who “put a committed Socialist in the White House, one Barack Hussein Obama.” Whenever one of President Obama’s detractors want to really shove the political knife in his or his supporters guts, they always are sure to mention, in a very vituperative manner, the President’s middle name, as if that somehow makes him less patriotic than say, someone named Tom Tancredo. 

     Governor Palin has already boxed herself into a corner by vehemently criticizing White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel for his remarks about “retarded Democrats.” Palin, who recently gave birth to a child with Down Syndrome, was up in arms as she called for Emanuel’s firing, stating that his remarks were an insult to special-needs children everywhere.

     The problem is that conservative radio talking head Rush Limbaugh used the same word (retarded) more than once (see posted YouTube video) and even stated that he wasn’t going to apologize for using it, citing this country’s obsession with political correctness as his main reason. But if you’re waiting for Palin to criticize Rush, who is considered the High Priest of conservative talking points, you’re about to turn bluer than an Obama victory rally. My suggestion is that Governor Palin stop taking such things so personally, especially if she isn’t going to have the stones (can a woman have stones) to rebuke conservatives such as Tancredo and Limbaugh who commit the same real or perceived injustices. I’ll close by giving her a Christian admonition from the apostle Paul to his protege Timothy: “Do nothing by partiality.”

     Note: Just as I suspected, Sarah Palin spent the balance of her speech insulting the Obama administration and touting right-wing values, but never did she denounce the hateful, painful remarks of either Rush Limbaugh or Tom Tancredo. She naively thinks that this Tea Party movement is going to catch fire all over America, even though the lion’s share of Latinos, African Americans, or Asians are yet to embrace it. I’m still waiting for Palin to speak to an audience that is not 99% white. Maybe one of you have a photo of her doing this, but I won’t hold my breath . . .She, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, and the like are living in what I call OzzieAndHarrietLand . . .I’m waiting for the Fonz to pull up on his motorcycle with a young lady wearing bobbysocks clutching him as she holds on for dear life.

That’s my opinion; what’s yours? (c) 2010 Sherman Crockett

     I want to make what I consider to be a substantive comment about the murder of Florida lottery winner Abraham Shakespeare, who was murdered in what appears to have been a botched effort to steal his lottery millions. Shakespeare’s body was found last week, buried under a cement slab in a wooded area on a rural Florida property owned by slaying suspect Dorice Dee Dee Moore’s boyfriend, Shar Krasniqi. Police have said Shakespeare was killed April 6 or 7, 2009, at the house next door to the property where he was buried.

     The question that I have to ask is this: Why is it mandatory for lottery winners in any state, especially those who win millions of dollars, to reveal their and their families’ identities to literally millions of people as they stand, normally smiling from ear to ear, with an oversized paper check in their hands? If the reason is for positive publicity for state lotteries then that does not nearly meet the threshold of necessity for revealing lottery winners’ identities, especially when you consider the clear and present danger in which this places these new millionaires.

     Now here we have in Polk County, Florida, several families that are having to endure the grief and sorrow of having one of their loved ones arrested for murder, and the other as the victim of that homicide, possibly at least partially as a result of the fact that everyone within that particular television audience knew that this man had suddenly become very wealthy. In my opinion, instead of spending countless hours scheming to defeat President Obama’s domestic and foreign policy agenda, some forward thinking legislator at the state and/or national level should introduce legislation which would allow lottery winners to remain anonymous, especially when they have won millions of dollars. It doesn’t make sense to win all of that money and not be able to sensibly enjoy it because you are constantly being hounded by vultures and parasites who want to suddenly live off of your newly-found wealth.  Many of them will harrass you to no end, and unfortunately some will even resort to kidnapping and murder.

That’s my opinion; what’s yours? (c) 2010, Sherman Crockett

(source:http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/suspect-murder-lottery-winner-abraham-shakespeare-incriminates-interviews/story?id=9744309)

     I would like to begin this post by first letting you know that I am not a gay rights advocate. My biblical beliefs are that homosexuality is totally incompatible with the good, acceptable, and perfect will of Almighty God. Having said that, I want to also assert that  as American citizens, gays have the right to equal protection under our Constitution, especially as it pertains to their 1st  and 14th Amendment rights, which among other things, would include the right to privacy and freedom of expression without fear of either civilian or military reprisal.

     For example, under the 1st Amendment to our Constitution, Congress may not pass a law which prohibits freedom of expression, unless such expression represents a clear and present danger to individuals or to national security. Using this logic, if a person says “Yes, I am gay,” and can therefore be expelled from the armed forces, I believe that this person’s 1st Amendment rights have been clearly violated, unless it can be demonstrated that by stating a person’s sexual orientation such a statement will increase the chances for Al Queda or some other enemy, foreign or domestic, to create breaches which would therefore possibly destroy or severely diminish our cherished political/social trinity of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

     As it pertains to the 14th Amendment, the following clause is worth examining: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

     I intentionally highlighted the privileges or immunities clause because I wanted to make the point that if gays are citizens of the U.S. their privileges and immunities cannot be taken away, which, I would think, includes the right to honorably serve their country. At the end of the day, to tell gays that they can join the military, fight, bleed, and die for this great nation, but can’t tell anyone that they are gay is incompatible with what this nation stands for, and I am glad that President Obama has ordered the military to take steps to repeal the 17 year-old “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy which was implemented as a military-gay community compromise under our 42nd president, Bill Clinton.  Even he wanted to allow gays full openess in their military careers, but he was voted down by his civilian and military presidential advisors, with only his Vice President , Al Gore, dissenting.

     In closing, I fully realize that I am not a military commander on the ground and so I am not armed with all of the facts, but I will say this: Unless our military leaders have indisputable proof that being openly gay will result in military victories for Al Queda or will result in other  national security breaches or a decline in troop morale, it is time to repeal this pitifully flawed military policy.

That’s my opinion, what’s yours? (c) 2010, Sherman Crockett, Jr.